PerformYard Vs Lattice: Pricing 2025, Features, and More

PerformYard provides highly customizable review forms and cycles, allowing HR teams to build and modify review processes according to company culture. It provides flexible review cycles, goal tracking, and 360-degree feedback, making it a strong fit for companies that want full control over their performance evaluation process.

What set it apart is its transparency with real-time tracking, allowing HR leaders and managers to monitor progress and completion rates without needing to chase employees for updates. It also automates reminders, approval notifications, and progress tracking to streamline the review cycle.

However, while it offers strong customization, it lacks AI-powered summaries or deep analytical insights, which may limit data-driven decision-making.

Lattice, on the other hand, focuses on making performance reviews more data-driven and insightful. It integrates AI-powered peer feedback summaries, goal tracking, and sentiment analysis, helping businesses extract actionable insights from employee evaluations.

Its automation capabilities allow HR teams to customize review cycles with automated rules, templates, and real-time analytics. Although Lattice excels in data analysis, its level of customization in designing review forms and processes may not be as extensive as PerformYard.

PerformYard offers ready-to-use engagement surveys designed around seven key factors that influence employee satisfaction, all backed by behavioral science research. Its anonymous feedback feature makes it easy for employees to share honest opinions, while the cohort analysis helps compare engagement levels across different departments or job roles.

With a visual dashboard that tracks engagement trends over time, companies can spot concerns early and take proactive steps to improve workplace culture without having to create custom surveys from scratch.

Lattice, in contrast, is built for companies that have a more dynamic and AI-powered approach to engagement. Instead of running surveys occasionally, it offers pulse surveys—short, frequent check-ins that help measure employee sentiment on an ongoing basis. It also includes eNPS (Employee Net Promoter Score), which is a simple way to see how employees feel about the company, plus onboarding and exit surveys to understand why people stay or leave.

When it comes to data filtering, both platforms allow HR teams to break down engagement results by employee groups, but Lattice has a clear edge here. PerformYard is good at showing engagement trends at a department level, but Lattice adds heatmaps and demographic filtering, making it easier to analyze sentiment across locations, job roles, or experience levels.

Reporting And Analytics

PerformYard gives users extensive flexibility when it comes to customizing reports and analyzing performance data. It allows HR teams to filter and slice data based on teams, roles, or specific timeframes, making it easier to tailor reports to specific company needs. This level of control is great for companies that want detailed, performance-focused insights without being locked into pre-set templates.

Lattice also offers customizable reports, but it leans more towards pre-built analytics dashboards that track engagement, DEIB (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging), and HR program adoption rates.

One area where PerformYard stands out is its ability to maintain detailed performance histories, allowing companies to track employee progress across multiple review cycles. While Lattice also tracks employee data over time, its focus is more on cultural and engagement trends rather than individual performance tracking.

Where Lattice stands out is in linking performance data with overall HR analytics. It connects performance to pay, employee satisfaction, and fairness across different groups, providing a broader view of workforce trends.

PerformYard focuses on cascading goal setting, meaning goals are aligned from the top down, ensuring individual, team, and company-wide objectives are connected. Managers can track progress year-round, making it easy to check in, provide feedback, and adjust goals when necessary.

A key advantage is that PerformYard directly integrates goal progress into performance reviews, creating a seamless evaluation process. Additionally, its built-in visualization tools generate charts and graphs that clearly show goal progression at individual, team, and department levels—making it easier to assess performance.

Lattice also supports goal alignment but takes a more OKR-driven approach (Objectives and Key Results). Unlike traditional goal tracking, OKRs are designed to be more agile, allowing organizations to adjust priorities mid-cycle. This flexibility can be a major advantage for fast-paced industries where objectives shift frequently. One drawback is that frequent goal adjustments can make it harder to track long-term progress, while PerformYard keeps a clear and structured record over time.

Pricing

PerformYard provides all-inclusive pricing, meaning users get access to performance reviews, goals, feedback, and analytics in one package. The only add-on is for ‘Employee Engagement’ module, which includes surveys and engagement data.

The plans are as follows:

• Performance Management: $5–$10 per person/month
• Employee Engagement Add-On: +$1–$3 per person/month

Lattice bills all contracts annually and offers flexible pricing for its various HR solutions, allowing companies to purchase ‘Performance and OKRs’ module separately or as part of a Talent Management package.

The plans are:

• Talent Management: $11/seat/month
• Performance or OKRs (Separate Purchase): $8/seat/month
• HRIS: $10/seat/month
• Engagement Add-On: +$4/seat/month
• Grow Add-On: +$4/seat/month
• Compensation Add-On: +$6/seat/month